Re: Cables again. For Arny, et al.

"nebulax" <nebulax@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:fqpq7l0prp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> BTW, please don't take my arguments to indicate that I'm
> advocating spending $500+ a meter on cables, because I'm
> truly not, and I couldn't afford to spend that much even
> if I wanted to. One of the folks who I quoted, Roger
> Sanders, is selling interconnects that he makes from
> Belden video coax, and he's only charging $59 for a 5ft
> pair, but even THAT is too expensive for me (right now
> anyway). I wish the whole cable/sound issue wasn't even
> an issue, but to my ears it is, and so I'm trying to find
> the most economical way to sonic neutrality, that's all.

As a rule, the worst thing about the give-away interconnects that come
with 
audio gear is the connectors, not the cable.  The cable itself is
inherently 
sonically neutral when used in reasonable lengths, and with almost any
piece 
of audio gear.

Coax can be used to make some very techhy-looking cables, especially with 
the right connectors. All that has nothing to do with sound, its all about

appearances.