Re: Cables again. For Arny, et al.

"jeffc" <jeffc226@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:fp9sp402itp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Norman M. Schwartz" <nmsz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:fp57rk019kh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Can "anyone" say for certain that only _one_ variable is involved here?
>> Maybe some trivial explanation applies such as the wax moved about in 
>> WG's
>> ear canal?
>
> Although you meant it in jest (or did you?), explanations like this are 
> far
> more common and far more important than most people realize.
>

Taken out of context, and with so many variables being involved, I can't
say 
what I meant. :-)