Re: audio culture nonsense?

Steven Sullivan wrote:

>>> ...'nonsense' would include neary every 'review' ever published
>>> in the audio press, ...even soul-changing
>>> differences between amplifiers and disc players.

I answered:
> 
> "Soul-changing" differences????? Examples, please! 

Sullivan responds:

> Would you prefer 'danceable' cables?

No. You mentioned "soul changing differences between amplifiers and disc 
players " cited by the audio press, and I asked for an examples. Now, 
you change the subject to cables. It is beginning to look like you are 
simply making this up as you go along.

I also asked Sullivan:

>> - what is the 
>> "interweb?"

he answers:

> It's a joke.

Oh. I don't get it. Is this whole argument of your's a joke, too?

> So, it's *your* ignorance of audiophile claims, not mine, that we're
dealing with

Correct. You referenced fuzzy "audiophile claims" and I told you I don't 
know what you're talking about. When questioned about alleged 
"soul-changing differences between amplifiers and disc players," you 
change the subject to cables. So I still don't know what you're talking 
about.

He cites:
> CABLE ELEVATORS PLUS (SET OF 8)
> Keep all your audio cables off the floor with our best-selling,
reviewer-recommended Cable Elevators. These really work 
> wonders and come with our 100% Money Back Guarantee... $159.99

And Sullivan says:
> That's laughable NONSENSE, sir.

Perhaps. Surely, the claim is dubious, but I've never evaluated the 
product. Have you? There's a money-back guarantee, so there's no risk on 
your part.

> 'Group' -- can *you* think of what claims I might be talking about when
I refer to 
> 'audiophile nonsense'?

You're making the assertions, Sullivan... and now asking the group for 
evidence? I get it, this is all just silly jive on your part.