Re: C-Audio schematic?

bob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

> "Phil Allison" wrote:
> ><bob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>
> >> To be technically correct, RF would apply to any frequency capable of
> >> generating radio waves,
> >
> > **  WRONG.

Correct. Therer are however conventions that seek to separate the accepted
bands.


> > The context being * audio amps *  makes it wrong usage.
> >
> >......    Phil
>
> So you say that because it's an audio amp any oscillations in the amp
have to be
> related to audio - IE supersonic rather than radio frequency?
>
> Fair enough I guess... I never thought about it before.
>
> Thanks Phil

Except that *SUPERSONIC* means something else entirely.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supersonic

I accidentally used the term once myself here when I meant ultrasonic and
Phil gave
me no end of trouble over it. You see Phil is in his mind 'never wrong',
he has a
mental illness, so he's not to be taken entirely seriously although he is
quite
technically competent.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultrasound

Is the one you want, but most techs call oscillation in 50-100kHz+ or so
region
'RF'.

Graham