"Sean Conolly" <sjconolly_98@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:z0NWj.3936$Kk3.2660@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Denny Conn" <denny.g.conn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:482B0E57.CFDF3DD0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sean Conolly wrote:
> >> My limited experience
> >> with Crowns has been a 100% failure rate.
> >>
> >> Sean
> >
> > I keep hearing this from people and my experience is exactly the
> > opposite. We've been driving our PAs here (3 different systems) with
> > Crowns (Macro 2400 & 3600) for over 10 years and have never had a
single
> > faliure. 2 of the 3 systems are installs, though, so that might make
a
> > difference. The 3rd is a field system that gets used about 5-8 times
a
> > year.
>
> I wasn't trying to be a troll, which is why I said 'limited experience'
-
> maybe 6 amps over the years. The most alarming one was a new micro-tech
that
> toasted after a few months at a house gig. I don't know about it's
service
> life after it was repaired because I moved on to another band.
>
> By constrast my old QSC 1700 lasted 20 years before it finally went
down,
> outliving every Crown we had - combined! I was starting to think it
might
> even outlive me :-)
>
> I think with amps the rule is: cheap, lightweight, and reliable - pick
any
> two.
>
> Sean
>
>
The diff is Micro's vs Macro's.
I firmly believe most Crowns but the Macro's are junk.
|
