by "michael gaster" <gaster@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 13, 2008 at 04:41 PM
"Joe Kotroczo" <kotroczo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:C44D0A95.554EE%kotroczo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 11/05/08 19:56, in article
> RL6dnYA_PMXYrrrVnZ2dnUVZ_qTinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "michael gaster" <gaster@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> (...)
>>
>> my point is we are talking about the pattern of the mic, if it picks up
>> in a
>> figure 8 pattern, it is a figure 8! why would it matter as to how it is
>> achieved?
> (...)
>>
>> I don't think any rules were written that said "for a figure 8 pattern
to
>> be
>> recognized as a true 'figure 8' it must utilize no more than a single
>> (one)
>> transducing element"
>
> What I'm curious about is the distance between the capsules... I'd
really
> be
> interested in seeing a polar plot.
>
>
> --
> Joe Kotroczo kotroczo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
perhaps some combfiltering issues I suppose
im pretty much of the opinion that the only figure 8 mic is the Royer SF-1
--
Michael Gaster
Gaster Engineering
