"Arny Krueger" <arnyk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:rb2dnUf_AONH073VnZ2dnUVZ_jmdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "George's ProSound Company" <bmoas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> message news:c849$481f3736$62107879$5121@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> Come this weekend I am donateing 650$ worth of time and
>> equipment for the Blessed Virgin Mother Academy
>> they are haveing a spring festival
>> so what is it again that you did that pro's dont do
>> without the bragging and chest pumping you have
>> accomplished?
>
> What George misses is that the OP put a heck of a lot more into the job
> than just a weekend, or $650 worth of time. Besides $650 worth of time
is
> meaningless, without an hourly rate.
Are you stupid or what? That is what George would charge for such an event
which includes labour at whatever hourly rate he charges.
> An event such as the OP described can easily involve 100 or more hours
of
> work over a period of several months. For George to make an unfavorable
> comparison of 100 or more hours of work over several months to a weekend
> gig shows how out-of-touch George is.
No, it just shows what a pedantic and pathetic little nit-picker you are
Arny and that you will grasp at any straw to try and discredit those who
daily show you up for the know-nothing blowhard you are.
Now then, you still have a post to answer which I will repost below. Of
course you will still be too much of a coward to answer it but no matter
as
I will keep reposting it every time I reply to one of your posts until
such
time as you are man enough to fess up to your mistakes.
Phildo
"Arny Krueger" <arnyk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:juednbIIzcJ0qJPVnZ2dnUVZ_jGdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> Phildo it is quite clear that you have no faults, and
>>>>> have never done anything wrong.
>
>>>> I never said anything of the sort.
>
>>> You don't have to Phildo - you have been living it out
>>> here for years.
>
>> You just keep telling yourself that Arnold.
>
> Thanks Phildo for again demonstrating that according to you, you have no
> faults and have never done anything wrong.
Wrong Arnold, I make mistakes but, unlike you, I admit to them and learn
from them, something you are incapable of doing and the main reason why
people here are so frustrated with you.
>>>> Unlike you I am
>>>> perfectly capable of admitting when I have made a
>>>> mistake and learning from my errors.
>>>
>>> I see zero evidence of that. Has anybody here seen you
>>> admit that you were wrong?
>
>> It's all in google for everybody to see, unlike you of
>> course where there is just one single example of you
>> admitting your mistakes.
>
> Since you can't provide any URLs sup****ting your claim Phildo, we have
> clear evidence that you are just talking out of the back of your neck.
In
> contrast, I've do***ented my claims with URLs that point to relevant
posts
> in the Google archive.
URL Arnold, singular, one example, pitiful in its loneliness. Sorry, I
don't
have the time to troll through google to prove you wrong so I could only
come up with these few examples in the few minutes I had. Strangely enough
though I have in the past spent hours looking for yours but couldn't come
up
with any. Go figure.
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/74dc2ef435872f1e/4137ec7f7de6e005?lnk=st&q=#4137ec7f7de6e005
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/cf224cb084f53a9a/92fd74dc7c6f0d13?lnk=st&q=#92fd74dc7c6f0d13
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/8a2811d652b89edb/a1117279922d1ffe?lnk=st&q=#a1117279922d1ffe
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/4465d6257de6f1e2/cd0991fbbad5f1b2?lnk=st&q=#cd0991fbbad5f1b2
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/4060543f4af2f8c0/63d7759f5e277387?lnk=st&q=#63d7759f5e277387
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/8a56d8dd4a66744d/9d97e31eb68de4bd?lnk=st&q=#9d97e31eb68de4bd
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/1fe6aea7f77efe9d/008e60ceb64c147d?lnk=st&q=#008e60ceb64c147d
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/4f80d59829599df5/ec75d84a40926e1e?lnk=st&q=#ec75d84a40926e1e
I think that is your arse firmly handed to you on a plate there Arnold.
>>>> Of course you will now drag
>>>> out your FOH moment which is the single example on
>>>> usenet of you admitting you made a mistake but only after you
>>>> realised you had made a COMPLETE fool of yourself.
>
>>> Case in point Phildo. I've proven with quotes from
>>> Google that I didn't wait for anything but the next time
>>> I posted to AAPLS and saw the correction.
>
>> Quote, singular. One example.
>
> You can't even do that, Phildo.
See above. Now you have been proven wrong are you man enough to admit you
made a mistake or are you just too chicken?
>>No more to be found in
>> google despite your numerous promises to provide plenty
>> of examples which, as usual, you failed to do.
>
>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/msg/65684fca1d598857
>
> "...let me say that I posted a link that would disclose my error."
>
>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/msg/9115a000e753416c
>
> "Ooops, my error."
Both pointing to the one singular example where you admitted you were
wrong
after making such a horriffic error that the entire group was laughing at
you. Forget that one example Arnold, how about some more unrelated to that
incident?
>>> Phildo, this is another example, a well-do***ented
>>> example. of your inability to admit that you are wrong.
>>
>> So you say. Luckily google says otherwise.
>
> Since you can't post any evidence sup****ting that claim Phildo, its an
> empty claim. Worthless.
See above. Arnold. Arse. Plate.
>>> Thank you for providing it so promptly!
>
>>>> Then again your admission consisted of "I have found a
>>>> number of websites that agree with you" not "I was
>>>> wrong".
>>>
>>> I guess that I did not bleed enough blood at that moment
>>> to please your thirst for my blood, Phildo. Nevertheless
>>> I have repeatedly said that I was wrong since then, but
>>> it still does not satisfy you.
>
>> It is the ONLY example of you admitting your mistakes,
>> even when proven wrong.
>
> See the above Phldo, which prove you wrong at least twice.
Sadly not Arnold since both of them refer to your infamous FOH episode.
>>>> Please take your words out of my mouth as I find them
>>>> most distasteful.
>>>
>>> I speak the truth right now, and of course it is
>>> distasteful to you Phildo.
>
>> Only in your deluded little mind Arnold.
>
> Phildo - I've got the evidence of my admissions of errors posted in this
> thread three times and you can't come up with any at all.
One single admission on your part which you keep dragging up as if it is
something to be proud of. In just a few minutes I managed to find 8
examples
of me admitting I was wrong. Care to admit now that you are talking out of
your arse? Not that it matters because I just proved it in front of
everyone.
>Who is deluded, me the guy with the facts on his side, or you Phildo,
with
>nothing but hot air to sup****t you?
Hot air? How do you explain those 8 google URLs above when you claimed I
couldn't come up with any? Way to go Arny, you just got busted yet again.
Everybody is laughing at you (as usual).
Maybe you'll resort to flaming on grammatical errors again but we all
remember what happened the last time you tried that one with George. I'll
repost it after my sig purely to add to your humiliation.
Phildo
"John Corbett" <corbett@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:corbett-0804081327490001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <7tudnTYfyvNItmfanZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, "Arny
Krueger"
> <arnyk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> <tbmoas58@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:-vGdnepkfJ_Zt2fanZ2dnUVZ_vOlnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> > iI
>>
>> Not a relevant English word.
>>
>> > disagree, a flatter response is just that, flatter-its
>> > not better or worse until you add the application
>> > flatter is NOT better for announcer mics at my
>> > motors****ts events
>>
>> No proper punctuation and a run-on sentence.
>>
>> > flatter is NOT cleaner
>>
>> No proper punctuation.
>>
>> > cleaner refers to signal to noise ratio
>>
>> No proper punctuation and a run-on sentence.
>>
>> Ignores the fact that cleaner is also commonly used to denote lack of
>> distortion and non-flat frequency response.
>>
>> > just a
>>
>> improper spelling of a two letter word: as
>>
>> > if something is 180 degrees out of phase that
>> > doesn
>>
>> improper spelling of a six letter word: doesn't
>>
>> > not mean its polarity is reversed
>>
>> But the two are interchanged all the time.
>>
>> No proper punctuation.
>>
>> >> It`s hardly a scientific measure of sonic accuracy, but
>> >> I`m sure most of us would understand the meaning in that
>> >> context.
>>
>> Agreed. George is well-known for butchering the English language and
the
>> principles of electrical engineering while trying to pick a fight with
>> people he's already figured out that he hates.
>>
>> > and while many do give wide berth to incorrect words,
>> > that does not make them useful when trying to establish a
>> > specific property
>>
>> No proper punctuation, and yet another run-on sentence.
>>
>> > I use plenty of woirds incorrectly, and I understand when
>> > some one says get that CABLE when they mean get that WIRE
>> > but wire is not cable
>>
>> No proper punctuation, and yet another run-on sentence.
>>
>> > flatter is not cleaner
>>
>> Except that is a common usage.
>>
>> No proper punctuation.
>>
>> > and proximity effect is not a filter
>>
>> Except it is.
>>
>> No proper punctuation.
>>
>> > no matter how convoluted the logic becomes trying to make
>> > it so
>>
>> No proper punctuation.
>>
>> > George
>>
>> Someone who needs to learn that if he's going to chase down the dust
>> specs in other people's eyes, he should first pull the railroad tie out
>> of his own. :-(
>
>
>
> "Carping about syntax and spelling, effective admission of defeat in
> any Usenet debate."
> --- Arny Krueger
>
> "According to Usenet rules, the first guy to write a sentence crabbing
> about the other guy's spelling loses."
> --- Arny Krueger
>
> "As always, you can tell who thinks they have lost the argument, by who
> starts picking nits with the spelling and punctuation."
> --- Arny Krueger
>
> "Anybody who complains about occasional errors in spelling or
punctuation
> on
> Usenet is known as a "loser"."
> --- Arny Krueger
>
> "It is well known that it is a true sign of defeat when someone starts
> picking at minor errors in spelling and punctuation."
> --- Arny Krueger
>
> "People who rant and rave about trivial spelling errors come off as
being
> monumentally pompous."
> --- Arny Krueger
>
> "It's one of those rules of Usenet, that when someone starts picking at
> the
> spelling or punctuation, they are either really bored, or know they've
> lost
> the argument on logical grounds, or both."
> --- Arny Krueger
|
