http://tinyurl.com/69bvwf
"Phildo" <Phil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:...
>
> "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:jr-dnf3QKrU8LLzVnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> "John O" <johnospamalot@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>> message news:YNgUj.14598$V14.1542@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> "Phildo" <Phil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote...
>>
>>> ....yet another in a series of relentless and pointless
>>> attempts to extend a moronic argument.
>>
>> Agreed. Phildo's post was violently OT and repetitive.
>
> I only keep repeating it because you keep ignoring it.
>
>>> Arny, it's time to killfile this idiot.
>>
>> If you haven't noticed, I'm just not responding to his taunts.
>
> That is because doing so will mean you having to admit you were wrong
and
> you are just too much of a yellowbelly to ever do that. You have to be
the
> biggest coward I have ever encountered.
>
> You must have a really low opinion of everyone here if you think one
> single person is fooled by your excuses. Everybody can see you are just
a
> coward whose outsize ego prevents him from admitting he was wrong, even
> when presented with irrefutable proof. All you are doing is showing
> everybody here what a fool you truly are.
>
>>> This is a bad
>>> example, but he's at the point Britney reached last
>>> fall...it's not funny or entertaining anymore, just sad
>>> and pathetic.
>>
>> I don't recall Phildo ever being funny, except for the one post of his
>> that is immortalized on PSW.
>
> You are not funny Arny, just pathetic.
>
>>> Don't let him drag you down to his level of
>>> depravity. Let him flap in the breeze alone.
>>
>> That's my strategy at this point. I'm all for turning the other cheek -
>> if he settles down in a few weeks I'll never know if he's killfiled.
>
> I will keep repeating it until such time as you grow some balls and stop
> being such a chicken long enough to admit you were wrong. Until then the
> humiliation will continue.
>
> Speaking of which........
>
>
> "Phildo" <Phil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:...
>>
>> "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:juednbIIzcJ0qJPVnZ2dnUVZ_jGdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> Phildo it is quite clear that you have no faults, and
>>>>>>> have never done anything wrong.
>>>
>>>>>> I never said anything of the sort.
>>>
>>>>> You don't have to Phildo - you have been living it out
>>>>> here for years.
>>>
>>>> You just keep telling yourself that Arnold.
>>>
>>> Thanks Phildo for again demonstrating that according to you, you have
no
>>> faults and have never done anything wrong.
>>
>> Wrong Arnold, I make mistakes but, unlike you, I admit to them and
learn
>> from them, something you are incapable of doing and the main reason why
>> people here are so frustrated with you.
>>
>>>>>> Unlike you I am
>>>>>> perfectly capable of admitting when I have made a
>>>>>> mistake and learning from my errors.
>>>>>
>>>>> I see zero evidence of that. Has anybody here seen you
>>>>> admit that you were wrong?
>>>
>>>> It's all in google for everybody to see, unlike you of
>>>> course where there is just one single example of you
>>>> admitting your mistakes.
>>>
>>> Since you can't provide any URLs sup****ting your claim Phildo, we have
>>> clear evidence that you are just talking out of the back of your neck.
>>> In contrast, I've do***ented my claims with URLs that point to
relevant
>>> posts in the Google archive.
>>
>> URL Arnold, singular, one example, pitiful in its loneliness. Sorry, I
>> don't have the time to troll through google to prove you wrong so I
could
>> only come up with these few examples in the few minutes I had.
Strangely
>> enough though I have in the past spent hours looking for yours but
>> couldn't come up with any. Go figure.
>>
>>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/74dc2ef435872f1e/4137ec7f7de6e005?lnk=st&q=#4137ec7f7de6e005
>>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/cf224cb084f53a9a/92fd74dc7c6f0d13?lnk=st&q=#92fd74dc7c6f0d13
>>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/8a2811d652b89edb/a1117279922d1ffe?lnk=st&q=#a1117279922d1ffe
>>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/4465d6257de6f1e2/cd0991fbbad5f1b2?lnk=st&q=#cd0991fbbad5f1b2
>>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/4060543f4af2f8c0/63d7759f5e277387?lnk=st&q=#63d7759f5e277387
>>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/8a56d8dd4a66744d/9d97e31eb68de4bd?lnk=st&q=#9d97e31eb68de4bd
>>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/1fe6aea7f77efe9d/008e60ceb64c147d?lnk=st&q=#008e60ceb64c147d
>>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/4f80d59829599df5/ec75d84a40926e1e?lnk=st&q=#ec75d84a40926e1e
>>
>> I think that is your arse firmly handed to you on a plate there Arnold.
>>
>>>>>> Of course you will now drag
>>>>>> out your FOH moment which is the single example on
>>>>>> usenet of you admitting you made a mistake but only after you
>>>>>> realised you had made a COMPLETE fool of yourself.
>>>
>>>>> Case in point Phildo. I've proven with quotes from
>>>>> Google that I didn't wait for anything but the next time
>>>>> I posted to AAPLS and saw the correction.
>>>
>>>> Quote, singular. One example.
>>>
>>> You can't even do that, Phildo.
>>
>> See above. Now you have been proven wrong are you man enough to admit
you
>> made a mistake or are you just too chicken?
>>
>>>>No more to be found in
>>>> google despite your numerous promises to provide plenty
>>>> of examples which, as usual, you failed to do.
>>>
>>>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/msg/65684fca1d598857
>>>
>>> "...let me say that I posted a link that would disclose my error."
>>>
>>>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/msg/9115a000e753416c
>>>
>>> "Ooops, my error."
>>
>> Both pointing to the one singular example where you admitted you were
>> wrong after making such a horriffic error that the entire group was
>> laughing at you. Forget that one example Arnold, how about some more
>> unrelated to that incident?
>>
>>>>> Phildo, this is another example, a well-do***ented
>>>>> example. of your inability to admit that you are wrong.
>>>>
>>>> So you say. Luckily google says otherwise.
>>>
>>> Since you can't post any evidence sup****ting that claim Phildo, its an
>>> empty claim. Worthless.
>>
>> See above. Arnold. Arse. Plate.
>>
>>>>> Thank you for providing it so promptly!
>>>
>>>>>> Then again your admission consisted of "I have found a
>>>>>> number of websites that agree with you" not "I was
>>>>>> wrong".
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess that I did not bleed enough blood at that moment
>>>>> to please your thirst for my blood, Phildo. Nevertheless
>>>>> I have repeatedly said that I was wrong since then, but
>>>>> it still does not satisfy you.
>>>
>>>> It is the ONLY example of you admitting your mistakes,
>>>> even when proven wrong.
>>>
>>> See the above Phldo, which prove you wrong at least twice.
>>
>> Sadly not Arnold since both of them refer to your infamous FOH episode.
>>
>>>>>> Please take your words out of my mouth as I find them
>>>>>> most distasteful.
>>>>>
>>>>> I speak the truth right now, and of course it is
>>>>> distasteful to you Phildo.
>>>
>>>> Only in your deluded little mind Arnold.
>>>
>>> Phildo - I've got the evidence of my admissions of errors posted in
this
>>> thread three times and you can't come up with any at all.
>>
>> One single admission on your part which you keep dragging up as if it
is
>> something to be proud of. In just a few minutes I managed to find 8
>> examples of me admitting I was wrong. Care to admit now that you are
>> taling out of your arse? Not that it matters because I just proved it
in
>> front of everyone.
>>
>>>Who is deluded, me the guy with the facts on his side, or you Phildo,
>>>with nothing but hot air to sup****t you?
>>
>> Hot air? How do you explain those 8 google URLs above when you claimed
I
>> couldn't come up with any? Way to go Arny, you just got busted yet
again.
>> Everybody is laughing at you (as usual).
>>
>> Maybe you'll resort to flaming on grammatical errors again but we all
>> remember what happened the last time you tried that one with George.
I'll
>> repost it after my sig purely to add to your humiliation.
>>
>> Phildo
>>
>>
>> "John Corbett" <corbett@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:corbett-0804081327490001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> In article <7tudnTYfyvNItmfanZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, "Arny
>>> Krueger"
>>> <arnyk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> <tbmoas58@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> news:-vGdnepkfJ_Zt2fanZ2dnUVZ_vOlnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>> > iI
>>>>
>>>> Not a relevant English word.
>>>>
>>>> > disagree, a flatter response is just that, flatter-its
>>>> > not better or worse until you add the application
>>>> > flatter is NOT better for announcer mics at my
>>>> > motors****ts events
>>>>
>>>> No proper punctuation and a run-on sentence.
>>>>
>>>> > flatter is NOT cleaner
>>>>
>>>> No proper punctuation.
>>>>
>>>> > cleaner refers to signal to noise ratio
>>>>
>>>> No proper punctuation and a run-on sentence.
>>>>
>>>> Ignores the fact that cleaner is also commonly used to denote lack of
>>>> distortion and non-flat frequency response.
>>>>
>>>> > just a
>>>>
>>>> improper spelling of a two letter word: as
>>>>
>>>> > if something is 180 degrees out of phase that
>>>> > doesn
>>>>
>>>> improper spelling of a six letter word: doesn't
>>>>
>>>> > not mean its polarity is reversed
>>>>
>>>> But the two are interchanged all the time.
>>>>
>>>> No proper punctuation.
>>>>
>>>> >> It`s hardly a scientific measure of sonic accuracy, but
>>>> >> I`m sure most of us would understand the meaning in that
>>>> >> context.
>>>>
>>>> Agreed. George is well-known for butchering the English language and
>>>> the principles of electrical engineering while trying to pick a fight
>>>> with people he's already figured out that he hates.
>>>>
>>>> > and while many do give wide berth to incorrect words,
>>>> > that does not make them useful when trying to establish a
>>>> > specific property
>>>>
>>>> No proper punctuation, and yet another run-on sentence.
>>>>
>>>> > I use plenty of woirds incorrectly, and I understand when
>>>> > some one says get that CABLE when they mean get that WIRE
>>>> > but wire is not cable
>>>>
>>>> No proper punctuation, and yet another run-on sentence.
>>>>
>>>> > flatter is not cleaner
>>>>
>>>> Except that is a common usage.
>>>>
>>>> No proper punctuation.
>>>>
>>>> > and proximity effect is not a filter
>>>>
>>>> Except it is.
>>>>
>>>> No proper punctuation.
>>>>
>>>> > no matter how convoluted the logic becomes trying to make
>>>> > it so
>>>>
>>>> No proper punctuation.
>>>>
>>>> > George
>>>>
>>>> Someone who needs to learn that if he's going to chase down the dust
>>>> specs in other people's eyes, he should first pull the railroad tie
out
>>>> of his own. :-(
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Carping about syntax and spelling, effective admission of defeat in
>>> any Usenet debate."
>>> --- Arny Krueger
>>>
>>> "According to Usenet rules, the first guy to write a sentence crabbing
>>> about the other guy's spelling loses."
>>> --- Arny Krueger
>>>
>>> "As always, you can tell who thinks they have lost the argument, by
who
>>> starts picking nits with the spelling and punctuation."
>>> --- Arny Krueger
>>>
>>> "Anybody who complains about occasional errors in spelling or
>>> punctuation on
>>> Usenet is known as a "loser"."
>>> --- Arny Krueger
>>>
>>> "It is well known that it is a true sign of defeat when someone starts
>>> picking at minor errors in spelling and punctuation."
>>> --- Arny Krueger
>>>
>>> "People who rant and rave about trivial spelling errors come off as
>>> being
>>> monumentally pompous."
>>> --- Arny Krueger
>>>
>>> "It's one of those rules of Usenet, that when someone starts picking
at
>>> the
>>> spelling or punctuation, they are either really bored, or know they've
>>> lost
>>> the argument on logical grounds, or both."
>>> --- Arny Krueger
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
|
