"Arny Krueger" <arnyk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:jr-dnf3QKrU8LLzVnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "John O" <johnospamalot@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> message news:YNgUj.14598$V14.1542@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> "Phildo" <Phil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote...
>
>> ....yet another in a series of relentless and pointless
>> attempts to extend a moronic argument.
>
> Agreed. Phildo's post was violently OT and repetitive.
I only keep repeating it because you keep ignoring it.
>> Arny, it's time to killfile this idiot.
>
> If you haven't noticed, I'm just not responding to his taunts.
That is because doing so will mean you having to admit you were wrong and
you are just too much of a yellowbelly to ever do that. You have to be the
biggest coward I have ever encountered.
You must have a really low opinion of everyone here if you think one
single
person is fooled by your excuses. Everybody can see you are just a coward
whose outsize ego prevents him from admitting he was wrong, even when
presented with irrefutable proof. All you are doing is showing everybody
here what a fool you truly are.
>> This is a bad
>> example, but he's at the point Britney reached last
>> fall...it's not funny or entertaining anymore, just sad
>> and pathetic.
>
> I don't recall Phildo ever being funny, except for the one post of his
> that is immortalized on PSW.
You are not funny Arny, just pathetic.
>> Don't let him drag you down to his level of
>> depravity. Let him flap in the breeze alone.
>
> That's my strategy at this point. I'm all for turning the other cheek -
if
> he settles down in a few weeks I'll never know if he's killfiled.
I will keep repeating it until such time as you grow some balls and stop
being such a chicken long enough to admit you were wrong. Until then the
humiliation will continue.
Speaking of which........
"Phildo" <Phil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:...
>
> "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:juednbIIzcJ0qJPVnZ2dnUVZ_jGdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> Phildo it is quite clear that you have no faults, and
>>>>>> have never done anything wrong.
>>
>>>>> I never said anything of the sort.
>>
>>>> You don't have to Phildo - you have been living it out
>>>> here for years.
>>
>>> You just keep telling yourself that Arnold.
>>
>> Thanks Phildo for again demonstrating that according to you, you have
no
>> faults and have never done anything wrong.
>
> Wrong Arnold, I make mistakes but, unlike you, I admit to them and learn
> from them, something you are incapable of doing and the main reason why
> people here are so frustrated with you.
>
>>>>> Unlike you I am
>>>>> perfectly capable of admitting when I have made a
>>>>> mistake and learning from my errors.
>>>>
>>>> I see zero evidence of that. Has anybody here seen you
>>>> admit that you were wrong?
>>
>>> It's all in google for everybody to see, unlike you of
>>> course where there is just one single example of you
>>> admitting your mistakes.
>>
>> Since you can't provide any URLs sup****ting your claim Phildo, we have
>> clear evidence that you are just talking out of the back of your neck.
In
>> contrast, I've do***ented my claims with URLs that point to relevant
>> posts in the Google archive.
>
> URL Arnold, singular, one example, pitiful in its loneliness. Sorry, I
> don't have the time to troll through google to prove you wrong so I
could
> only come up with these few examples in the few minutes I had. Strangely
> enough though I have in the past spent hours looking for yours but
> couldn't come up with any. Go figure.
>
>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/74dc2ef435872f1e/4137ec7f7de6e005?lnk=st&q=#4137ec7f7de6e005
>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/cf224cb084f53a9a/92fd74dc7c6f0d13?lnk=st&q=#92fd74dc7c6f0d13
>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/8a2811d652b89edb/a1117279922d1ffe?lnk=st&q=#a1117279922d1ffe
>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/4465d6257de6f1e2/cd0991fbbad5f1b2?lnk=st&q=#cd0991fbbad5f1b2
>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/4060543f4af2f8c0/63d7759f5e277387?lnk=st&q=#63d7759f5e277387
>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/8a56d8dd4a66744d/9d97e31eb68de4bd?lnk=st&q=#9d97e31eb68de4bd
>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/1fe6aea7f77efe9d/008e60ceb64c147d?lnk=st&q=#008e60ceb64c147d
>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/4f80d59829599df5/ec75d84a40926e1e?lnk=st&q=#ec75d84a40926e1e
>
> I think that is your arse firmly handed to you on a plate there Arnold.
>
>>>>> Of course you will now drag
>>>>> out your FOH moment which is the single example on
>>>>> usenet of you admitting you made a mistake but only after you
>>>>> realised you had made a COMPLETE fool of yourself.
>>
>>>> Case in point Phildo. I've proven with quotes from
>>>> Google that I didn't wait for anything but the next time
>>>> I posted to AAPLS and saw the correction.
>>
>>> Quote, singular. One example.
>>
>> You can't even do that, Phildo.
>
> See above. Now you have been proven wrong are you man enough to admit
you
> made a mistake or are you just too chicken?
>
>>>No more to be found in
>>> google despite your numerous promises to provide plenty
>>> of examples which, as usual, you failed to do.
>>
>>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/msg/65684fca1d598857
>>
>> "...let me say that I posted a link that would disclose my error."
>>
>>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/msg/9115a000e753416c
>>
>> "Ooops, my error."
>
> Both pointing to the one singular example where you admitted you were
> wrong after making such a horriffic error that the entire group was
> laughing at you. Forget that one example Arnold, how about some more
> unrelated to that incident?
>
>>>> Phildo, this is another example, a well-do***ented
>>>> example. of your inability to admit that you are wrong.
>>>
>>> So you say. Luckily google says otherwise.
>>
>> Since you can't post any evidence sup****ting that claim Phildo, its an
>> empty claim. Worthless.
>
> See above. Arnold. Arse. Plate.
>
>>>> Thank you for providing it so promptly!
>>
>>>>> Then again your admission consisted of "I have found a
>>>>> number of websites that agree with you" not "I was
>>>>> wrong".
>>>>
>>>> I guess that I did not bleed enough blood at that moment
>>>> to please your thirst for my blood, Phildo. Nevertheless
>>>> I have repeatedly said that I was wrong since then, but
>>>> it still does not satisfy you.
>>
>>> It is the ONLY example of you admitting your mistakes,
>>> even when proven wrong.
>>
>> See the above Phldo, which prove you wrong at least twice.
>
> Sadly not Arnold since both of them refer to your infamous FOH episode.
>
>>>>> Please take your words out of my mouth as I find them
>>>>> most distasteful.
>>>>
>>>> I speak the truth right now, and of course it is
>>>> distasteful to you Phildo.
>>
>>> Only in your deluded little mind Arnold.
>>
>> Phildo - I've got the evidence of my admissions of errors posted in
this
>> thread three times and you can't come up with any at all.
>
> One single admission on your part which you keep dragging up as if it is
> something to be proud of. In just a few minutes I managed to find 8
> examples of me admitting I was wrong. Care to admit now that you are
> taling out of your arse? Not that it matters because I just proved it in
> front of everyone.
>
>>Who is deluded, me the guy with the facts on his side, or you Phildo,
with
>>nothing but hot air to sup****t you?
>
> Hot air? How do you explain those 8 google URLs above when you claimed I
> couldn't come up with any? Way to go Arny, you just got busted yet
again.
> Everybody is laughing at you (as usual).
>
> Maybe you'll resort to flaming on grammatical errors again but we all
> remember what happened the last time you tried that one with George.
I'll
> repost it after my sig purely to add to your humiliation.
>
> Phildo
>
>
> "John Corbett" <corbett@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:corbett-0804081327490001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> In article <7tudnTYfyvNItmfanZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, "Arny
Krueger"
>> <arnyk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>> <tbmoas58@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:-vGdnepkfJ_Zt2fanZ2dnUVZ_vOlnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> > iI
>>>
>>> Not a relevant English word.
>>>
>>> > disagree, a flatter response is just that, flatter-its
>>> > not better or worse until you add the application
>>> > flatter is NOT better for announcer mics at my
>>> > motors****ts events
>>>
>>> No proper punctuation and a run-on sentence.
>>>
>>> > flatter is NOT cleaner
>>>
>>> No proper punctuation.
>>>
>>> > cleaner refers to signal to noise ratio
>>>
>>> No proper punctuation and a run-on sentence.
>>>
>>> Ignores the fact that cleaner is also commonly used to denote lack of
>>> distortion and non-flat frequency response.
>>>
>>> > just a
>>>
>>> improper spelling of a two letter word: as
>>>
>>> > if something is 180 degrees out of phase that
>>> > doesn
>>>
>>> improper spelling of a six letter word: doesn't
>>>
>>> > not mean its polarity is reversed
>>>
>>> But the two are interchanged all the time.
>>>
>>> No proper punctuation.
>>>
>>> >> It`s hardly a scientific measure of sonic accuracy, but
>>> >> I`m sure most of us would understand the meaning in that
>>> >> context.
>>>
>>> Agreed. George is well-known for butchering the English language and
>>> the principles of electrical engineering while trying to pick a fight
>>> with people he's already figured out that he hates.
>>>
>>> > and while many do give wide berth to incorrect words,
>>> > that does not make them useful when trying to establish a
>>> > specific property
>>>
>>> No proper punctuation, and yet another run-on sentence.
>>>
>>> > I use plenty of woirds incorrectly, and I understand when
>>> > some one says get that CABLE when they mean get that WIRE
>>> > but wire is not cable
>>>
>>> No proper punctuation, and yet another run-on sentence.
>>>
>>> > flatter is not cleaner
>>>
>>> Except that is a common usage.
>>>
>>> No proper punctuation.
>>>
>>> > and proximity effect is not a filter
>>>
>>> Except it is.
>>>
>>> No proper punctuation.
>>>
>>> > no matter how convoluted the logic becomes trying to make
>>> > it so
>>>
>>> No proper punctuation.
>>>
>>> > George
>>>
>>> Someone who needs to learn that if he's going to chase down the dust
>>> specs in other people's eyes, he should first pull the railroad tie
out
>>> of his own. :-(
>>
>>
>>
>> "Carping about syntax and spelling, effective admission of defeat in
>> any Usenet debate."
>> --- Arny Krueger
>>
>> "According to Usenet rules, the first guy to write a sentence crabbing
>> about the other guy's spelling loses."
>> --- Arny Krueger
>>
>> "As always, you can tell who thinks they have lost the argument, by who
>> starts picking nits with the spelling and punctuation."
>> --- Arny Krueger
>>
>> "Anybody who complains about occasional errors in spelling or
punctuation
>> on
>> Usenet is known as a "loser"."
>> --- Arny Krueger
>>
>> "It is well known that it is a true sign of defeat when someone starts
>> picking at minor errors in spelling and punctuation."
>> --- Arny Krueger
>>
>> "People who rant and rave about trivial spelling errors come off as
being
>> monumentally pompous."
>> --- Arny Krueger
>>
>> "It's one of those rules of Usenet, that when someone starts picking at
>> the
>> spelling or punctuation, they are either really bored, or know they've
>> lost
>> the argument on logical grounds, or both."
>> --- Arny Krueger
>
>
>
|
