On May 7, 10:01=A0pm, "SotR" <fli...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> =A0 Well, I finally got a chance to try the OM2 I bought a while back
> (actually forgot I bought it and never took it to rehearsal ;-)
> =A0 Most of you didn't feel it was that good of a mic. But I'll tell ya,
i=
t
> really works for my voice. I have 2 EV's (N/D 257 and 357) 4 Oktava
MK012'=
s.
> Then the SM 57's and 58's, a Sennheiser e838 and a Beyer M69 that are
stud=
io
> property. The OM2 as far as my voice goes beat's them all to ****.
> =A0 Actually I was amazed. I am not much of a singer and need all the
help=
I
> can get. Upon the opinions expressed here I thought I wasted my money.
But=
,
> even the rest of the band thought I sounded good, in fact noticeably so.
> They were like "whoa dude, where did that voice come from?". My words
were=
> very audible, it really cut through the mix and it just seemed to make
me
> sound better than I ever remember. I actually liked my voice for the
first=
> time ever over a PA.
> =A0Oh well, some people might sound best on a Radio Shack mic who knows
wh=
at's
> gonna work. But now I'm curious to try the more pricey Audix stuff.
>
> SotR
If the OM2 works for you and your voice, that's great. Though it's
relatively low end for the Audix line, it's still better then a SM58.
If you're impressed with the OM2, I suspect you'd be blown away by the
OM6 and 7.
Rupert
|
