"Phildo" <Phil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:...
>
> "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:juednbIIzcJ0qJPVnZ2dnUVZ_jGdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> Phildo it is quite clear that you have no faults, and
>>>>>> have never done anything wrong.
>>
>>>>> I never said anything of the sort.
>>
>>>> You don't have to Phildo - you have been living it out
>>>> here for years.
>>
>>> You just keep telling yourself that Arnold.
>>
>> Thanks Phildo for again demonstrating that according to you, you have
no
>> faults and have never done anything wrong.
>
> Wrong Arnold, I make mistakes but, unlike you, I admit to them and learn
> from them, something you are incapable of doing and the main reason why
> people here are so frustrated with you.
>
>>>>> Unlike you I am
>>>>> perfectly capable of admitting when I have made a
>>>>> mistake and learning from my errors.
>>>>
>>>> I see zero evidence of that. Has anybody here seen you
>>>> admit that you were wrong?
>>
>>> It's all in google for everybody to see, unlike you of
>>> course where there is just one single example of you
>>> admitting your mistakes.
>>
>> Since you can't provide any URLs supporting your claim Phildo, we have
>> clear evidence that you are just talking out of the back of your neck.
In
>> contrast, I've documented my claims with URLs that point to relevant
>> posts in the Google archive.
>
> URL Arnold, singular, one example, pitiful in its loneliness. Sorry, I
> don't have the time to troll through google to prove you wrong so I
could
> only come up with these few examples in the few minutes I had. Strangely
> enough though I have in the past spent hours looking for yours but
> couldn't come up with any. Go figure.
>
>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/74dc2ef435872f1e/4137ec7f7de6e005?lnk=st&q=#4137ec7f7de6e005
>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/cf224cb084f53a9a/92fd74dc7c6f0d13?lnk=st&q=#92fd74dc7c6f0d13
>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/8a2811d652b89edb/a1117279922d1ffe?lnk=st&q=#a1117279922d1ffe
>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/4465d6257de6f1e2/cd0991fbbad5f1b2?lnk=st&q=#cd0991fbbad5f1b2
>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/4060543f4af2f8c0/63d7759f5e277387?lnk=st&q=#63d7759f5e277387
>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/8a56d8dd4a66744d/9d97e31eb68de4bd?lnk=st&q=#9d97e31eb68de4bd
>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/1fe6aea7f77efe9d/008e60ceb64c147d?lnk=st&q=#008e60ceb64c147d
>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/browse_frm/thread/4f80d59829599df5/ec75d84a40926e1e?lnk=st&q=#ec75d84a40926e1e
>
> I think that is your arse firmly handed to you on a plate there Arnold.
>
>>>>> Of course you will now drag
>>>>> out your FOH moment which is the single example on
>>>>> usenet of you admitting you made a mistake but only after you
>>>>> realised you had made a COMPLETE fool of yourself.
>>
>>>> Case in point Phildo. I've proven with quotes from
>>>> Google that I didn't wait for anything but the next time
>>>> I posted to AAPLS and saw the correction.
>>
>>> Quote, singular. One example.
>>
>> You can't even do that, Phildo.
>
> See above. Now you have been proven wrong are you man enough to admit
you
> made a mistake or are you just too chicken?
>
>>>No more to be found in
>>> google despite your numerous promises to provide plenty
>>> of examples which, as usual, you failed to do.
>>
>>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/msg/65684fca1d598857
>>
>> "...let me say that I posted a link that would disclose my error."
>>
>>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.audio.pro.live-sound/msg/9115a000e753416c
>>
>> "Ooops, my error."
>
> Both pointing to the one singular example where you admitted you were
> wrong after making such a horriffic error that the entire group was
> laughing at you. Forget that one example Arnold, how about some more
> unrelated to that incident?
>
>>>> Phildo, this is another example, a well-documented
>>>> example. of your inability to admit that you are wrong.
>>>
>>> So you say. Luckily google says otherwise.
>>
>> Since you can't post any evidence supporting that claim Phildo, its an
>> empty claim. Worthless.
>
> See above. Arnold. Arse. Plate.
>
>>>> Thank you for providing it so promptly!
>>
>>>>> Then again your admission consisted of "I have found a
>>>>> number of websites that agree with you" not "I was
>>>>> wrong".
>>>>
>>>> I guess that I did not bleed enough blood at that moment
>>>> to please your thirst for my blood, Phildo. Nevertheless
>>>> I have repeatedly said that I was wrong since then, but
>>>> it still does not satisfy you.
>>
>>> It is the ONLY example of you admitting your mistakes,
>>> even when proven wrong.
>>
>> See the above Phldo, which prove you wrong at least twice.
>
> Sadly not Arnold since both of them refer to your infamous FOH episode.
>
>>>>> Please take your words out of my mouth as I find them
>>>>> most distasteful.
>>>>
>>>> I speak the truth right now, and of course it is
>>>> distasteful to you Phildo.
>>
>>> Only in your deluded little mind Arnold.
>>
>> Phildo - I've got the evidence of my admissions of errors posted in
this
>> thread three times and you can't come up with any at all.
>
> One single admission on your part which you keep dragging up as if it is
> something to be proud of. In just a few minutes I managed to find 8
> examples of me admitting I was wrong. Care to admit now that you are
> taling out of your arse? Not that it matters because I just proved it in
> front of everyone.
>
>>Who is deluded, me the guy with the facts on his side, or you Phildo,
with
>>nothing but hot air to support you?
>
> Hot air? How do you explain those 8 google URLs above when you claimed I
> couldn't come up with any? Way to go Arny, you just got busted yet
again.
> Everybody is laughing at you (as usual).
>
> Maybe you'll resort to flaming on grammatical errors again but we all
> remember what happened the last time you tried that one with George.
I'll
> repost it after my sig purely to add to your humiliation.
>
> Phildo
>
>
> "John Corbett" <corbett@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:corbett-0804081327490001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> In article <7tudnTYfyvNItmfanZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, "Arny
Krueger"
>> <arnyk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>> <tbmoas58@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:-vGdnepkfJ_Zt2fanZ2dnUVZ_vOlnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> > iI
>>>
>>> Not a relevant English word.
>>>
>>> > disagree, a flatter response is just that, flatter-its
>>> > not better or worse until you add the application
>>> > flatter is NOT better for announcer mics at my
>>> > motorsports events
>>>
>>> No proper punctuation and a run-on sentence.
>>>
>>> > flatter is NOT cleaner
>>>
>>> No proper punctuation.
>>>
>>> > cleaner refers to signal to noise ratio
>>>
>>> No proper punctuation and a run-on sentence.
>>>
>>> Ignores the fact that cleaner is also commonly used to denote lack of
>>> distortion and non-flat frequency response.
>>>
>>> > just a
>>>
>>> improper spelling of a two letter word: as
>>>
>>> > if something is 180 degrees out of phase that
>>> > doesn
>>>
>>> improper spelling of a six letter word: doesn't
>>>
>>> > not mean its polarity is reversed
>>>
>>> But the two are interchanged all the time.
>>>
>>> No proper punctuation.
>>>
>>> >> It`s hardly a scientific measure of sonic accuracy, but
>>> >> I`m sure most of us would understand the meaning in that
>>> >> context.
>>>
>>> Agreed. George is well-known for butchering the English language and
>>> the principles of electrical engineering while trying to pick a fight
>>> with people he's already figured out that he hates.
>>>
>>> > and while many do give wide berth to incorrect words,
>>> > that does not make them useful when trying to establish a
>>> > specific property
>>>
>>> No proper punctuation, and yet another run-on sentence.
>>>
>>> > I use plenty of woirds incorrectly, and I understand when
>>> > some one says get that CABLE when they mean get that WIRE
>>> > but wire is not cable
>>>
>>> No proper punctuation, and yet another run-on sentence.
>>>
>>> > flatter is not cleaner
>>>
>>> Except that is a common usage.
>>>
>>> No proper punctuation.
>>>
>>> > and proximity effect is not a filter
>>>
>>> Except it is.
>>>
>>> No proper punctuation.
>>>
>>> > no matter how convoluted the logic becomes trying to make
>>> > it so
>>>
>>> No proper punctuation.
>>>
>>> > George
>>>
>>> Someone who needs to learn that if he's going to chase down the dust
>>> specs in other people's eyes, he should first pull the railroad tie
out
>>> of his own. :-(
>>
>>
>>
>> "Carping about syntax and spelling, effective admission of defeat in
>> any Usenet debate."
>> --- Arny Krueger
>>
>> "According to Usenet rules, the first guy to write a sentence crabbing
>> about the other guy's spelling loses."
>> --- Arny Krueger
>>
>> "As always, you can tell who thinks they have lost the argument, by who
>> starts picking nits with the spelling and punctuation."
>> --- Arny Krueger
>>
>> "Anybody who complains about occasional errors in spelling or
punctuation
>> on
>> Usenet is known as a "loser"."
>> --- Arny Krueger
>>
>> "It is well known that it is a true sign of defeat when someone starts
>> picking at minor errors in spelling and punctuation."
>> --- Arny Krueger
>>
>> "People who rant and rave about trivial spelling errors come off as
being
>> monumentally pompous."
>> --- Arny Krueger
>>
>> "It's one of those rules of Usenet, that when someone starts picking at
>> the
>> spelling or punctuation, they are either really bored, or know they've
>> lost
>> the argument on logical grounds, or both."
>> --- Arny Krueger
>
>
>
|
