Re: more on confused signals april 20

Rupert wrote:

>> There is no difference between designing an active and a passive
>> cross-over, but it is a lot easier to make an active cross-over do
>> what you want it to do ... indeed!

> Though I know passive crossovers can be 24dB per octave, I've never
> seen them used in live sound reinforcement boxes. They tend to be
> 12dB/ oct designs.

Crossover spec is about actual slopes, I'm inclined to assume that the 
cheaper high power cross-over is the active one.

> Rupert


   Kind regards

   Peter Larsen