Re: Phildo Lies 3 Times In One Post. What's new?

"www.locoworks.com" <videochas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:e017718b-2d39-4cb5-9371-ec3f8e4050ad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Apr 26, 8:07?am, "Arny Krueger" <ar...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:

>>Phildo spewed:

>>> Arny wrote:

>>>> Phildo spewed:

>>>> This newsgroup is not a place for discussion of faith,
>>>> it is for a discussion of sound irrespective of what
>>>> fairy story you believe in.

>>> This is of course one of Phildo's favorite lying attacks
>>> on other people's faith - that Christianity is a fairy
>>> tale. Just like his PSW lie, he's lying again because
>>> much of Christianity is about history, and that history
>>> has been verified by other historical sources than the
>>> Bible.

>> Bull**** and you know it.

>> Shows your ignorance, Phildo. There's plenty of
>> historical evidence relating to the origins of
>> Christitanity. It's not my fault that you spout off the
>> trash you do in ignorance of it.

> Phildo was not contesting the origin of Xtianity, Arny,
> but the reallity of it.

Oh, its the old "I'll change the story once proven wrong, instead of 
admitting my error" trick.

Loco, as the comments you deleted showed, Phildo called Christianity a 
"fairy story".

We all know what a "fairy story" is - its a story about things that did
not 
ever happen.

But Christianity is a story about many things that did actually happen.

Therefore, Christianity is not a fairy story. It's a story about things
that 
did actually happen.

> It seems to this impartial observer of this continuing
> (and numbingly repetitive) jousting that Phildo is trying
> to be the voice of reason and Arny is preaching in the
> voice of faith.

Wrong again, Loco. Phildo clearly called Christianity a "fairy story".

Furthermore Loco, by calling Christianity "Xtianity" you've tipped your
hand 
and called yourself a liar, You're not an impatial obserer but by your 
choice of words, a critic of Christianity. Are you just baiting me or are 
you really that stupid?

> Now in the several millenia that this contest has been
> going on in the real world, neither voice has emerged
> triumphant and that is because they have no common ground
> on which to compete.  Faith demands the suspension of
> reason and reason demands the rejection of faith.

This is not about faith, this is about whether or not Christianity is a 
"fairy story". In fact Christianity is about historical facts, stories
about 
events and people that actually happened. You may not agree with what
those 
people believed, but unlike a "fairy story" they were real people and what

they did was real.

> You two should just "get over it", or in the words of the
> timeworn cliche: agree to disagree.

I'd be happy to agree with Phildo to agree or disagree, depending on the 
topic. Phildo has turned this into a blood fight, and he has sworn to
drive 
me off of AAPLS.