Re: odd !

"Joe L" <I'm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:CV9Qj.90943$Cj7.58033@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "liquidator" <mikeh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:fur45u$6rd$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > news:4810DF74.3D30BC3E@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> I agree about the 3dB thing and ears. The commonly accepted norm is
that
> > most
> >> people can hear 1dB volume increments but my point was that even that
is
> > an
> >> underestimate for 'trained ears'.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Graham I think you can find lots better than 3 dB.
> >
> > Probably can also find worse.
> >
> > We need some ground rules to this though...
> >
> > I am willing to bet you your favorite brew most people on the planet
> > cannot
> > consistently identify 139 dB versus 140 db.
>
>
> No, cause they'll be deaf.  Do you know how loud that is?
>
> http://www.howstuffworks.com/question124.htm
>
>
> JL
>
>

Trying to prove you can read?

They won't be deaf, but will likely suffer damage, sepecially if the
exposure is more than very brief.


Besides, that ain't loud...Servotech cabs cancelling out the sound of a
jet
engine...that is loud!