WHY DO YOU KEEP BULLETING ALL THE NEWSGROUP YOU @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
WACK JOB>
MI5 YOUR ASS
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 09:01:38 +0000 (UTC), mfievmfv@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>-= MI5:. bugging and counter-surveillance -=
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>PO: >Did you ever look for. the bugs in your house ? If not, why not ? I
mean if
>PO: >I thought that was happening to me, I'd search the place from top.
to bottom,
>PO: >I mean I live there I would know if anything. was out of place. If I
was
>PO: >really suspicious, I would call in one of those bug detection. teams
which
>PO: >have. those machines that pick up the transmitted radio waves. This
>PO: >reminds me of BUGS, that new. programme on BBC1 on
>
>That's exactly. what we did. We went to a competent, professional
detective
>agency in London, paid. them over 400 quid to debug our house. They used
>scanner devices which go to over 1 GHz and would. pick up any nearby
>transmitter in that range, they also checked the phones. and found
>nothing... but. if the tap was at the exchange, then they wouldn't find
>anything,. would they?
>
>CS:. >Doesn't this suggest to you that there are, in fact, no bugs to be
found?
>
>You can assume that they've done this sort of. thing to other people in
more
>"serious" cases, where they would know the targets would suspect. the
>presence of electronic surveillance. So. they will have developed
techniques
>and devices. which are not readily detectable either by visual inspection
or
>by electronic means. What those techniques might be, I. couldn't guess.
>
>In this case, the existence of bugging. devices was clear from the
>beginning, and they "rubbed it in" with what was. said by the boy on the
>coach. It was almost as if they wanted counter-surveillance people. to be
>called in, who they knew would fail to detect. the bugging devices,
causing
>loss of credibility to the other things I would have to say. relating to
the
>harassment.
>
>I did all the things someone in. my situation would do to try to find the
>bugs. In addition to calling in professional. help using electronic
>counter-surveillance, I made a close. visual inspection of electrical
>equipment, plus. any points where audio or video surveillance devices
might
>have been concealed. Of course, I found nothing. Normal. surveillance
>"mini-cameras" are quite noticeable and. require visible supporting
>circuitry. It seems to me the. best place to put a small video
surveillance
>device would be additional to a piece of electronic equipment. such as a
TV
>or video. It would be necessary to physically break in to. a property to
fit
>such a. device.
>
>3562
|
