This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_00FF_01C87530.21E847D0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I had tried with Fleximusic wave editor for recording phone calls, i =
found static noise were appeared, but after using Noise reduction filter =
in Fleximusic wave editor, it redduces the noise and gave me a better =
output. May be you can try it.
<pjstock@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message =
news:5ec529ca-33c7-4bcb-ac4c-c786fc5c43b2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I am experimenting with using my MZ-RH910 to record telephone
> interviews for use in radio features. I purchased a small telephone
> line adapter from a spy supply store here in Toronto and it seems to
> work pretty well. it seems to just have a telephone type plug on one
> end and a mini-stereo jack on the other -- but the guy at the store
> told me it actually had some electronics built into the mini-stereo
> jack end.
>=20
> anyway, after trying it with all sorts of combinations -- with
> different telephones, with the Internet connected and disconnected,
> with the USB to PC data cable connnected and disconnected (that seemed
> to cause an enormous amount of static) here's what I"ve found. (I've
> also learned to try to get the interview subject to use a fixed line
> phone and not a cell or speaker phone.)
>=20
> Using the Line In plug gives me the cleanest recording but very low
> levels. (So I have to use the amplify effect in Audacity when I am
> editing) and my voice is recorded at a much higher level.
>=20
> Using the Mic In plg the levels are more balanced but the sound
> quality is worse -- far too much static.
>=20
> Question: what is the difference between the Line In and the Mic In
> plug that I would be getting such radically different results, each
> with their advantages? are they adapted for a different type of signal
> or something? which should I be using for this application?
>=20
> any suggestions for getting better results?
------=_NextPart_000_00FF_01C87530.21E847D0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.3268" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=3DVerdana size=3D2>I had tried with <A=20
href=3D"http://www.fleximusic.com/waveditor/overview.htm">Fleximusic
=
wave=20
editor</A> for recording phone calls, i found static noise were =
appeared,=20
but after using Noise reduction filter in Fleximusic wave editor, it =
redduces=20
the noise and gave me a better output. May be you can try =
it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DVerdana size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><</FONT><A =
href=3D"mailto:pjstock@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"><FONT=20
face=3DArial size=3D2>pjstock@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
></A><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2>> wrote=20
in message </FONT><A=20
href=3D"news:5ec529ca-33c7-4bcb-ac4c-c786fc5c43b2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"><FONT=20
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>news:5ec529ca-33c7-4bcb-ac4c-c786fc5c43b2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
></A><FONT=20
face=3DArial size=3D2>...</FONT></DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>>I =
am experimenting=20
with using my MZ-RH910 to record telephone<BR>> interviews for use in =
radio=20
features. I purchased a small telephone<BR>> line adapter from a spy =
supply=20
store here in Toronto and it seems to<BR>> work pretty well. it =
seems=20
to just have a telephone type plug on one<BR>> end and a mini-stereo =
jack on=20
the other -- but the guy at the store<BR>> told me it actually had =
some=20
electronics built into the mini-stereo<BR>> jack end.<BR>> =
<BR>>=20
anyway, after trying it with all sorts of combinations -- =
with<BR>>=20
different telephones, with the Internet connected and =
disconnected,<BR>> with=20
the USB to PC data cable connnected and disconnected (that =
seemed<BR>> to=20
cause an enormous amount of static) here's what I"ve found. =
(I've<BR>> also=20
learned to try to get the interview subject to use a fixed line<BR>> =
phone=20
and not a cell or speaker phone.)<BR>> <BR>> Using the Line In =
plug gives=20
me the cleanest recording but very low<BR>> levels. (So I have to use =
the=20
amplify effect in Audacity when I am<BR>> editing) and my voice is =
recorded=20
at a much higher level.<BR>> <BR>> Using the Mic In plg the levels =
are=20
more balanced but the sound<BR>> quality is worse -- far too much=20
static.<BR>> <BR>> Question: what is the difference between the =
Line In=20
and the Mic In<BR>> plug that I would be getting such radically =
different=20
results, each<BR>> with their advantages? are they adapted for a =
different=20
type of signal<BR>> or something? which should I be using for this=20
application?<BR>> <BR>> any suggestions for getting better=20
results?</FONT></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_00FF_01C87530.21E847D0--
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
