On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 14:14:25 GMT, SamSez <samtheman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>You quote the h2 bass boost to an accuracy of 5db, but brush off the
>difference in noise floor based on measurement technique. Nothing like
>having it both ways...
You are not reading or understanding what I am saying or both.
The link you refer me to provides a picture of an H2 where the bass
noise is at about -86 and the HF noise is >-126. 126 - 86 = 40 dB.
There is a 40 dB bass boost in the noise floor. I under re****ted the
bass boost on the H2, not minimized it.
As far as the difference in absolute reference of the noise floor
measurement itself, my point is to compare these two tests with
different measurement techniques without specifying the gain of the
mic preamps is totally meaningless. The bass boost part is not
totally meaningless because that is a RELATIVE measurement not an
ABSOLUTE measurement. The ABSOLUTE noise floor of the H2 vs the RH1 I
cannot tell from the data you have given me. I'm not minimizing it.
I cannot compare the two without more information about how the tests
were conducted.
I NEED TO KNOW THE AMOUNT OF GAIN THE MIC PREAMPS ARE PROVIDING TO
COMPARE THE TWO GRAPHS.
>Buy one where you can take it back and compare it yourself. For my use,
>my h2 is as good as my rh1, and with the h2's built-in multi-pattern
>mics, no motor noise, and trivial file handling on any PC, it's the unit
>I pick up first.
I'm glad you like it.
Julian
|
