It seems we are all done zooming at Zooomr's, or any other photosite for
that matter, at least neutrally. Now I could join Flickr, but the best
girls
are, of course, with Snapfish. And it would save me the bother of
terminating half the earth's population, which makes it less logistically
attractive to me as well. SO. Anyway, the paradigm of a photographic
digital
universe is rapidly fading, and you may have bought this $300 10.1 Mp
digital camera recently, but as to sharing your work over the internet you
would now be down to howmany pixels?
'''*'"`--''.'''''','''
How much exactly was that?
Ahem. 500 x 375 pixels.
That would be eh .. 187.5 Kp. That would be about half of VGA, PAL or
NTSC?
Not exactly HD or is it? So we can make footballfields of photographs, but
we can only "share" these sizes in the secluded company of our intimates,
whilst tor that reason everybody is now living apart, but by no means
together anymore, that is photographically. And you cannot even download
the
original size. Now I did foreshow this in previous posts, and forewarned
you
to buy the 3.1 Mp Kodak CX7310, if it were only available at its original
price of $100, and that's just two years ago, because its quality cannot
be
improved on by any digital standard, current or not. Current camera's
which
produce BOOTIFULL pictures in even better colours at even zooomr prices,
the
clear difference of which previously showed in my Zooomr album, although
500
x 375 would be exactly the definition at which the difference does not
show,
and neither does anything else.
Again, from behind this terminal, I wish to thank everybody involved in
unmanageably overloading the internet backbones by zooming into
photographs
irresponsibly, and as such commanding better prices for the completely
abstract things of life that are already free in the first place. Chop
chop.
tTLR the Technical Living-Room
at zooomr's
|
